How Ukraine could use U.S. Tomahawk missiles and how many it would need – expert

From a military standpoint, it is already clear that this would not be a classic Tomahawk, but rather a modernization — the Typhon missile. It is similar to the Tomahawk, with the key difference being that it is launched from ground-based launchers.

In about 90% of cases, Tomahawk missiles are launched from ships. Accordingly, their use involves deploying naval forces.

The United States has the most powerful navy in the world. It deploys its ships and strikes designated targets in line with assigned missions. From a military perspective, therefore, it is clear that the modernization of Typhon missiles, capable of ranges of 1,400 to 1,500 kilometers (870 to 930 miles), represents long-range weapons that would significantly enhance Ukraine’s capabilities.

From a political standpoint, of course, the final decision on transferring such weapons rests with the president of the United States, who must authorize their delivery.

Ukraine needs them because they would strengthen its defenses.

Moreover, the interests of Ukraine and the United States converge here. At present, the United States is globally focused on dominating the world oil market where possible. Prospects are emerging for Venezuelan oil, which Washington needs to sell and redirect to other markets, a process that is unfolding gradually.

From this perspective, limiting Russia’s export capabilities fits well within this logic, depriving it of those revenues. In this way, a combination could take effect in which sanctions against Rosneft and Lukoil are reinforced by military strikes.

To achieve this, however, it would be necessary to hit facilities directly responsible for oil exports, which are located in seaports. The four largest such ports handle about two-thirds of Russia’s oil exports. Two are in the Baltic Sea — Ust-Luga and Primorsk — and two are in the Black Sea — Novorossiysk and Tuapse.

Facilities in the Black Sea have already been struck by Ukraine’s defense forces. As for the Baltic Sea, with additional capabilities, this could also be addressed. That would significantly limit Russia’s ability to transport oil and impose a heavy economic burden.

Russia is currently seeking at least $16 billion to cover a budget deficit needed to finance the war.

Accordingly, Tomahawks would help Ukraine in this regard. Ukraine would need about 100 such missiles, which could change a great deal and inflict serious consequences on Russia — specifically on the capabilities and capacity of its oil transportation industry.

However, political considerations remain, and this ultimately depends on the political will of President Donald Trump.