Corruption overtakes Russian attacks as Ukrainians’ top threat, polls find
Nation12 August, 10:40 AM
“I think it began consistently ranking first after the first
wave of Mindichgate,” Hryniv told Radio
NV, referring to corruption in surveys about the country’s greatest
threats.
Hryniv said the concern reflects a genuine national problem,
not merely public perception.
“There’s no smoke without fire,” he said. “If society sees
the threat from corruption as this serious, then it doesn’t exist only ‘in
people’s heads.’ It is a real, serious problem for the country.”
But Hryniv also argued that corruption has become a catchall
political issue.
“The other problem is that corruption has become a populist
cause and the discussion is no longer specific: What kind of corruption are we
talking about? What form does it take? Who is to blame? Instead, it has simply
become a constant talking point,” he said. “That is the other side of the
problem. The public has become highly receptive to populism and readily
embraces causes such as the fight against corruption. That is also true.”
He suggested that financial hardship, rising prices and the
constant danger posed by drone and missile attacks may lead the public to
somewhat overstate the scale of corruption, among other factors.
“But the government and politicians need to understand that
corruption is under relentless public scrutiny,” Hryniv said. “It is a central
concern for society as a whole, not just for anti-corruption agencies.”
Until recently, Hryniv said, the largest share of Ukrainians
asked who was responsible for the country’s high level of corruption blamed
anti-corruption agencies, believing they had not done enough to fight it.
He said that view changed after parliament and the president
tried to restrict the powers of NABU, Ukraine’s National Anti-Corruption
Bureau, and SAPO, the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office.
“After parliament and the president tried to restrict the
powers of the anti-corruption agencies — effectively sidelining NABU and SAPO —
what happened? People realized that NABU and SAPO weren’t actually to blame,”
Hryniv said. “First, they blamed parliament because it passed the law. Over
time, they looked more closely and put all the blame on the president. The
unlimited power the president now wields therefore brings unlimited
responsibility, above all for corruption — not only corruption in his own
circle, but corruption throughout the country, for which he is responsible.”
In a survey
by the SOCIS Center for Social and Marketing Research published on Aug. 6,
49.3% of respondents identified high levels of corruption in government as the
factor doing the most harm to the country’s overall situation. Another 44.6%
chose repeated drone and missile attacks on energy, municipal and civilian
infrastructure.
A Kyiv International Institute of Sociology survey published
on May 6 found that 54% of respondents viewed corruption as the greater threat
to Ukraine’s development, compared with 39% who chose war.