ISW warns Russia’s energy truce could allow missile stockpiling for future mass attacks
A DTEK employee at one of the thermal power plants destroyed by Russian missile strikes, on Jan. 22, 2026. (Photo: REUTERS/Roman Baluk)
Russia’s reported agreement to pause strikes on Ukraine’s
energy infrastructure for a week would not amount to a genuine concession,
since the Kremlin continues to reject long-term ceasefire proposals and has
previously used short-term pauses to advance its own political agenda, the
Institute for the Study of War said in its latest assessment
from Jan. 29.
ISW analysts noted that the terms of the reported moratorium
remain vague. U.S. President Donald Trump claimed the Russian dictator agreed —
at his request — to suspend strikes on Kyiv and other Ukrainian cities for
seven days. But Trump offered no details on when the pause would begin, which
cities were involved, or what types of infrastructure would be spared.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy stopped short of
confirming a ceasefire but thanked Trump and the United States for their
“efforts to halt strikes on the energy sector during this period.”
The Kremlin has not confirmed any moratorium. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov refused to comment on early reports circulating in Russian Telegram channels — reports that appeared before Trump’s remarks. On Jan. 29, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov dismissed the idea of a 60-day or longer ceasefire as “unacceptable,” claiming Ukraine would use the time to rest, rearm, and rebuild its forces.
ISW suggested a temporary halt on long-range strikes could
play to Moscow’s advantage — but only if both sides comply. In that case,
Russian forces could stockpile missiles and drones for future massed attacks,
while Ukrainian forces would have to pause their own strikes on Russia’s energy
grid.
The think tank also recalled that the Kremlin has previously
declared similar unilateral pauses — without timelines or conditions — as part
of what ISW calls cognitive warfare aimed at projecting a false image of good
faith. Meanwhile, Moscow has consistently rejected Ukrainian and U.S. proposals
for sustained limits on strikes against civilian infrastructure.
The idea of a pause has sparked backlash among Russia’s pro-war military bloggers, many of whom warned it would weaken the Kremlin’s leverage over Kyiv. One prominent “war correspondent” claimed the reported moratorium is tied to the next round of Ukraine–Russia negotiations in Abu Dhabi, scheduled for Feb. 1.
The military war may be swinging in our favor, but the information war continues.
Just as an army needs soldiers, so does a free society need its journalists to ensure that people have access to honest, trustworthy voices to understand the world around them.
For the past five years, The New Voice of Ukraine has been working tirelessly to push back against Russian narratives and defend democracy. But we cannot do it alone.
Please consider supporting us on Patreon for just $5 a month – your donation does directly to supporting journalists and ensuring that this front of the infowar says solid and defended.
Thank you.
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Google News
